How shall they then live?

This week’s comic delves a bit more into the moral/legal framework of the Zombie Ranch world, which I must admit is one of the main reasons I was excited with developing the concept in the first place. Let’s face it, there’s plenty of zombie fiction out there dealing with the apocalypse as it happens, or the months/years immediately after… but not so much that thinks about what life might be like a few decades down the road. If history (and even pre-history) has shown us one thing, it’s that humanity are a bunch of real persistent buggers, even (or perhaps especially) in the worst of circumstances. Ice Age? Keep going. Collapse of Rome? Keep going. Black Death? Keep going. Even on a smaller scale, you have numerous examples of civilians in war zones somehow adjusting to being bombed and raped and murdered on an unconscionably regular basis, and carrying on. What’s unconscionable, even insane under our circumstances became routine under theirs, sometimes in only a matter of months.

The point is that for better or worse, people adjust. Ask them how they can possibly live like they do, and they will shrug. It’s enough that they live. Morals, law, and philosophy can wait, although if it goes on long enough, new codes of conduct can and will emerge. Eventually, you may get an entire generation who have trouble imagining there was ever any other way. Exploring this phenomenon is, I think, at the heart of a lot of themes of apocalyptic fiction, and I see no reason why a zombie apocalypse should be any different–which is probably one of the main reasons I was underwhelmed when I watched The Quick and the Undead several months ago: a movie purportedly set 82 years after the dead started walking should not really have any angsty scenes involving strangers reluctant to kill other strangers who have been bitten, presuming being bitten = inevitable zombification (and it did).

You can certainly make the argument that The Quick and the Undead was one of those films where you really shouldn’t bother trying to make sense out of what’s happening, but when an outright spoof like Shaun of the Dead makes more logical and emotional sense than a purportedly “serious” piece, well, there’s the heart of the matter. Hell, Shaun of the Dead even gave glimpses into how zombies might be incorporated into daily life once the immediate crisis was dealt with, and while they were meant for humorous effect, on another level they were funny because “Yeah… why *wouldn’t* there be zombie game shows?”

Now is Zombie Ranch meant as some hardcore, painstakingly researched take on how the world really might be once it adjusted to zombies in its midst? Heck no, but on the other hand the surviving folks of the Wild Zones have had a long time to adjust to their situation, and the laws of the new frontier, when they’re enforced at all, grew out of making official what people were already doing from a practical survival standpoint. You have to figure that after the first few years of denial and tears, it got to the point most sane and reasonable folk finally agreed that not killing grandma when she got bitten just put everybody at risk for no good reason.

Sane and reasonable, of course, in the context of this Weird New West. But when everything’s gone off kilter, after awhile it’s only the people on the outside who are going to notice  that the angle’s weird.

And then again, maybe they’re the straight and level ones, and you’re the one who ended up with the skewed perspective?

I’ll just meditate on my novelty nudie pen awhiles while y’all contemplate that.

7 thoughts on “How shall they then live?

  1. The last Zombie film i watched was Fido and that was one aspect of the film that impressed me the most. It showed not the Zombie Apocalypse, it showed the life after the Outbreak and in which ways the society adjust to the changes.

  2. As I’ve admitted before, Fido was a huge inspiration for Zombie Ranch. For such a tongue-in-cheek piece it can really get your thinker going.

  3. I highly recommend Feed by Mira Grant. There’s a lot in there about what it might do to a society to have an on-going zombie outbreak.

  4. Oho! I think I have a new addition to my Xmas list.

    Also, I love telling my relatives things like “Yeah, it’s a book called ‘Feed’. You should be able to get it off Amazon.”

  5. I love the idea of ranching zombies. It’s such a cool and realistic way that humans would react to something horrible. Some one will figure out how to use this new commodity.
    The movie Fido is so subtle (for a zombie movie). I really enjoyed it.
    My current fav zombie book is World War Z, but I haven’t read Feed. I’m going to have to check my library.

  6. I will warn you that many people don’t seem to consider it a book about zombies but more just a book with zombies in it. I don’t entirely see the distinction. I enjoyed it and am really looking forward to the sequels (next one out in 2011).

  7. Seems to me that’s a distinction that could equally apply to Zombie Ranch, but if you quizzed someone on what they meant by it you probably wouldn’t get much of a straight answer. It’s right up there with the heated arguments from people who disqualify any movie with fast or rage/”living” zombies as a zombie film.

    Anyhow, not long ago I read a whole anthology (The New Dead) that contained a lot of stories that weren’t necessarily zombies front-and-center, but were certainly about the kinds of themes that make zombie stories interesting to me. Reading it can really broaden your mind about the underpinnings and potential of the genre beyond just the standard “survivor(s) under siege” tale that started it all when Romero ripped off the novel I Am Legend (“ripped off” being his own half-joking words, although I give him more credit than he himself does for creating his own vision).

Comments are closed.