UPDATING OCCASIONALLY (FOR NOW)

6 thoughts on “542 – Catching Up

  1. Some friction, but yeah. IRL, I’d like these two…they should have kids. 😉

    1. I might have to draw out what their kid would look like. First thought is that their kid would look like Ongo Gablogian from “It’s Always Sunny In Philadelphia”

    2. He’s pushing 60, she’s maybe 30, more likely less. Chuck is most likely shooting blanks, and besides, he’s talking to her like a baby sister than a love interest.

  2. It is really hard to have a favorite character, as there are so many good ones. But I think Rosa is my favorite. Chuck is a good accomplice in sneaking work, but not much for romance. Uugh.

  3. I mean, if they don’t have at least an inkling of what’s going down, I’m actually disappointed in Clearstream. If anything, I’m starting to wonder if they caught on and realized “Wait, we can use this.”

    Because of course they can. 😉

  4. Dr. Norman (not a real doctor)

    I’m way ahead of you – I’ve been waiting for you to catch up. From November 2020:
    I would hope for nothing less – her and Chuck have the potential for a great deal of positive mischief.
    Speaking of which, I received the email notifying me that my order for the NSFW “Chuck and Rosa Finally Do It” (age verification required) limited edition hardcover is going to be delayed due to the pandemic. I think it’s really cool that you’ll be adding some additional stretch goal goodies when it ships – thanks for all your story and art.
    As for the inscription, ” We owe it all to you ” will be sufficient.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

 

542 – Catching Up

Hot hot heat

I don’t think I’d go so far as to say that the idea of zombies being “cold” made no sense to me, and that’s why I years ago decided the zeds of our particular settings wouldn’t go that route, at least so long as they were in periods of activity. It perhaps makes more sense, but I’m not precisely aiming for scientific acumen or ironclad logic on explaining how my dead people walk. That said, I have notes. This is not something I made up recently, it’s pretty much been there since the start and just hasn’t really come up in the story. Most of the time in this genre I think it’s a mistake to get too lost in the details of why your zombies work. As far as the story is concerned, keep to the important bits like, well… the biting. But then again it makes sense, doesn’t it? As a (layman) physics concept, motion requires expenditure of energy and energy expenditure gives off some measure of waste heat. That’s just basic thermodynamics right there… and now I’m starting to sound like Uncle Chuck but hopefully am not as off base as he sometimes can be. So I have my logic structure of why and how my zombies work but there’s every chance that were I to ever reveal every last detail of that the scientists in the audience could tear me apart as readily as any undead horde. Would they be right to do that? I suppose that would depend on how seriously I’m presenting things, and I like to think I’ve gotten across the gist that Zombie Ranch is not meant as some actual post-apoc survival guide for battling zombies. To paraphrase The Princess Bride: zombies are fiction, highness. Anyone who tries to tell you different is selling something.