UPDATING OCCASIONALLY (FOR NOW)

8 thoughts on “539 – A Knife In The Dark (END OF EPISODE 22)

  1. Why am I not surprised.

  2. Typical, it’s always someone else’s fault. Revenge is not just best served cold, but by stupid too. “This is all your fault!” Which is wrong, but in his head, it’s right.

    1. It’s also been heavily hinted he has already been brain washed by the zombie worshiping cult.

      1. Which, no doubt, made easier because of that under-lying feeling. People are always looking for a scape-goat…

    2. I don’t know if you got my callback by intent or not, but it’s great to see almost the same words echoed! https://www.zombieranchcomic.com/comic/203-breaking-worst/

  3. Honestly, probably the first time he’s ever taken control of and done ever in his life. There’s a reason why they kept him. Give a dog that’s been beat all its life a whiff of conference and control, you got a problem.

  4. Imagine his surprise when he stabs a pillow. 😜

  5. He isn’t in control, RC – he’s probably drugged to the very dilated eyeballs, probably with Datura. Back on p.443, Eustace is shown holding a Mojave Rattlesnake on a stick while the Brujefe milks it into a glass. Mojave venom A is a paralytic neurotoxin, like tetrodotoxin. Tetrodotoxin was thought to be part of the legendary Haitian “zombie powder”. The other part was Datura, which contains scopalamine, which messes with memory and concentration, and is supposed to render victims docile and suggestible.
    The question is, where did he get his current dose, and did a little drone whisper in his ear?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

 

539 – A Knife In The Dark (END OF EPISODE 22)

Happy Holidays, all! That's a wrap (heh) for Episode 22 just in time for a Christmas cliffhanger! Hope we don't twist the knife too much...

See y'all in 2025 when Zombie Ranch continues!

Scents and sensibility

There are a lot of writing guides out there offering tips to those trying to step up their game with their own fictional offerings. There’s a lot of advice in those guides, presented with varying degrees of authority and mandate, and sometimes hoping you’ll be willing to pay for the privilege rather than just browsing the free ones (semi-pro tip: they most often say the same things). Now, writing guides are not useless, especially if you’ve never read any. In fact, I encourage people interested in writing to read a lot of them, despite the redundancies you’ll come across. The most fascinating thing about them is not what the professional, published, successful writers delivering them your way have to say that’s the same, but what they have to say that’s different. Sometimes they’ll blatantly contradict one another on the habits and techniques that will lead you down the golden path. Sometimes, they’ll even contradict themselves. If you experience enough lists of guidelines, you may get the feeling that the ultimate statement regarding writing is, “Don’t do this, it’s bad and never works out well… unless it does.” Putting it another way, it’s like the old argument about Jesus which usually ended in some cocky teenager getting smacked. “Cut your damn hair!” “Jesus had long hair!” “That’s different. He was Jesus!” So for writing, we have: “Shorten your damn sentence!” “Faulkner wrote run on sentences!” “That’s different. He was Faulkner!” This usually ends in some cocky creative writing student getting a fail. But to be fair, I do agree it’s at least important to know the rules before you think about breaking them. You might still end up with crap, but at least you’re experimenting rather than just being ignorant. So check out all those different authors and their different rules, and see which ones make sense for your work. And honestly, sometimes, you get little gems of insight you might not have thought about, and that a dozen other guides didn’t mention either (maybe that particular author thought they were too obvious? who knows). For example, relating to this week’s comic is a gem I picked up along the way, which sadly I can’t remember the proper attribution for anymore, and it regards the senses. To badly paraphrase the original tip, the claim was that one of the hallmarks of a beginning writer is that they rely too heavily on how things look or sound, and never give consideration to other elements of the characters’ environment, especially in terms of how things smell. Maybe this is because humans don’t prioritize smell all that much, or that we don’t especially expect it in our entertainment media. I mean, I don’t, I’m actually rather glad that Smell-O-Vision was a failed experiment in immersive cinema that Hollywood has yet to try again. But we do notice smells, and, good or bad, they do have a big influence on our memories and reactions. They can even show, more than anything else, the difference between a native and a newcomer to a certain place. To me, a barnyard or ranch is still an almost eye-wateringly overpowering experience, while for my wife that same scent is a comforting memory of growing up. Conversely, someone who grew up on a mountain farm would probably feel like choking on the streets of Downtown L.A., while I looked oddly at them and wondered what the problem was. So, imagine the sort of stench a zombie ranch would have hanging over it… and yet, that stench would be all but invisible to people who have worked there all their lives. Certainly it would be invisible to a TV Crew whose only contact is remote drones being operated from miles away. But oh, poor Rosa. She may be no stranger to zombies, but it’s like the difference between driving by a cow pasture and being next to a slaughterhouse on a hot day. Her chutzpah has been undone in dramatic fashion by the simple expedient of no longer being upwind. And if characters have their own lives, as many writers will claim, then somewhere, somewhen, she’s cursing me for having read that guide.