UPDATING OCCASIONALLY (FOR NOW)
11

11 thoughts on “539 – A Knife In The Dark (END OF EPISODE 22)

  1. Why am I not surprised.

  2. Typical, it’s always someone else’s fault. Revenge is not just best served cold, but by stupid too. “This is all your fault!” Which is wrong, but in his head, it’s right.

    1. It’s also been heavily hinted he has already been brain washed by the zombie worshiping cult.

      1. Which, no doubt, made easier because of that under-lying feeling. People are always looking for a scape-goat…

    2. I don’t know if you got my callback by intent or not, but it’s great to see almost the same words echoed! https://www.zombieranchcomic.com/comic/203-breaking-worst/

  3. Honestly, probably the first time he’s ever taken control of and done ever in his life. There’s a reason why they kept him. Give a dog that’s been beat all its life a whiff of conference and control, you got a problem.

  4. Imagine his surprise when he stabs a pillow. 😜

  5. He isn’t in control, RC – he’s probably drugged to the very dilated eyeballs, probably with Datura. Back on p.443, Eustace is shown holding a Mojave Rattlesnake on a stick while the Brujefe milks it into a glass. Mojave venom A is a paralytic neurotoxin, like tetrodotoxin. Tetrodotoxin was thought to be part of the legendary Haitian “zombie powder”. The other part was Datura, which contains scopalamine, which messes with memory and concentration, and is supposed to render victims docile and suggestible.
    The question is, where did he get his current dose, and did a little drone whisper in his ear?

    1. Except Datura doesn’t do that. You’re thinking of the compound Scoplolmine (AKA the devil’s breath) which generally comes from a specific plant, Borrochero (Brugmansia arbora) that is native to Columbia that the gang in question probably would have had access to. It’s active compound obliterates free will, your conscious, you can function as normal but you are totally open to suggestion which is what happened to McCarty here. Datura just makes you trip mad balls and maybe die, but it does not make you a puppet.

  6. Dr. Norman (not a real doctor)

    Me lleva la chingada !

  7. I’m betting money there’s no one in that bed and it’s a ruse to get him caught.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

 

539 – A Knife In The Dark (END OF EPISODE 22)

Happy Holidays, all! That's a wrap (heh) for Episode 22 just in time for a Christmas cliffhanger! Hope we don't twist the knife too much...

See y'all in 2025 when Zombie Ranch continues!

Voice to the voiceless…

So let’s continue the discussion on dialog, because why not? A lot of people struggle with it. Any help those of us who don’t struggle with it (or don’t struggle as much) is probably welcome, assuming we can express our assistance properly. That part’s the rub, isn’t it? Last week I talked about how I’ve been writing all my life, over and over and over, but it seems like the greatest cop-out to tell someone having trouble to “just write.” Again I’ll equate it to the thought of Dawn telling me to “just draw.” Some more guidance than that would be appreciated, wouldn’t it? But when you’re so familiar with something, you have to go back and take it apart and try to figure out some of the underlying things that you think would help a newbie. These past few weeks I’ve been attempting to do that. So let’s talk a bit about what I’m just going to call “voice.” Do you hear your characters’ voices in your head? You really should. In fact, you might even want to speak your dialog aloud and see how it sounds. In the early days of Star Wars Harrison Ford is supposed to have famously told its creator, “George, you can write this shit but you sure can’t say it.” Do all your characters sound the same? They shouldn’t. True, groups of close friends will often develop a certain unifying vernacular, but if everyone’s just a generic quip machine that’s going to ring hollow after awhile. Quirks of speech aren’t just for determining who’s talking from off-panel, they can be downright crucial in establishing a sense of verisimilitude for a reader. Nothing’s worse for me than a bunch of twelve-year-olds talking like they were 35. You might even need to go listen to some actual twelve-year-olds for a refresher. I don’t want to say this isn’t hard, because for someone having trouble with it it’s of course going to be hard. So maybe start with the broad strokes, so to speak. Extreme characters and extreme situations… how would Characters A and B respond to Character C’s declaration of a risky plan? Character A: “Have you quite taken leave of your senses?!” Character B: “Dude! Are you nuts?” Without even seeing them represented on a page, these characters have formed a picture of who they are in your mind’s eye just by virtue of their words, haven’t they? So maybe do that several more times. Take one of your characters and imagine what they might say when threatened… when exhausted… when in love. Then take another character and do the same. Now put them together and let those different reactions interact. It’s alchemy of a sort, to be sure, but writers have been rediscovering the formula over many centuries, so I have a feeling you can, too.